Mayor of Portland, Maine, says he regrets voting to divest from Israel

Last month, the mayor of Portland, Maine, shocked Jewish communities in his backyard and beyond when he expressed full-throated support for his city council’s successful resolution to divest from companies linked to Israel.

Now, Mayor Mark Dion is taking it all back.

“Upon personal reflection and following many private conversations I have had with our Jewish neighbors, I have come to the conclusion that my vote on the divestment was wrong,” Dion said during prepared remarks at Monday’s city council meeting.

Admits mistake in judgment

He went on to call his stance on divestment “pretentious,” “a serious mistake in judgment” and “a betrayal to the trust that Jewish people should expect from the mayor’s office.” Dion concluded his remarks by giving what he called a “sincere apology” for his vote.

The about-face was another whiplash moment in the battle around divestment that has taken on new urgency since Israel’s war with Hamas began after the terror group’s Oct. 7, 2023, attacks last year.

Many colleges and universities have experienced deep divisions over divestment proposals, and local governments have also experienced their share.

Portland became the fourth and highest-profile American municipality since last Oct. 7 to back some form of divestment when its council unanimously approved a plan in September to withdraw city funds from dozens of companies it said were “complicit in the current and ongoing humanitarian crisis in Gaza and occupation of Palestine.”

Divestment proponents say the move is necessary to curb Israel’s retaliation in Gaza, which has killed tens of thousands of people and reduced most of the enclave to rubble.

The vote came over the stern objections of many in the local Jewish community, including the Jewish Community Alliance of Southern Maine, the local federation arm, which denounced the move as a “one-sided” and “performative gesture.”

Local Jewish pro-Palestinian activists supported it, and the Maine chapter of the anti-Zionist group Jewish Voice for Peace celebrated its passage. 

At the time, the mayor supported divestment, calling it “the greatest act of friendship” and said it was the city’s role to “grab [Israel’s] shoulder and say, ‘It’s enough. It’s simply enough.’” 

But to their evident surprise, the local government found that the measure was almost entirely symbolic. Weeks after its passage, Portland council members said the city has no funds invested in the dozens of companies on its divestment target list and that “no divestment is expected to occur” due to the resolution.

(When the resolution was first proposed months ago, city officials said, Portland held shares in a technology company that provides Israel with screening technology used at military checkpoints; the city sold those funds before the resolution’s passage.)

Both Dion and some council members told the Portland Press Herald that this news surprised them and that they believed Portland to be more heavily invested in companies that do business with Israel when they backed the resolution. 

“I guess on reflection, it’s a high price to pay to create division and anxiety in the community,” said Kate Sykes, a council member who also backed the initial divestment vote afterward.

Mayor thanked for his apology

The local Jewish federation recently brought on its first permanent CEO and thanked the mayor for his apology.

“In his statement, Mayor Dion admits that the resolution, which he now believes was misguided, only served to marginalize Portland’s Jewish community — particularly those who view Israel as the homeland of the Jewish people,” the Jewish Community Alliance of Southern Maine wrote in a statement shared with the Jewish Telegraphic Agency.

“We appreciate his honesty in recognizing the harm this caused and the difficulty of navigating these intricate issues in a local setting.”

In his apology, Dion echoed some long-standing Jewish communal criticisms of divestment measures, including that a local government has no business engaging in international matters.

He also went further, saying that his support of the measure has damaged some relationships “which may never be repaired.”

He added, “I had not only failed to stay in my lane, but I went totally off the road.”