menu-control
The Jerusalem Post

Iranian earthquake sparks debate over potential nuclear testing - report

 
 Iran's Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei views the Iran nuclear achievements, in Tehran, Iran June 11, 2023.  (photo credit: Office of the Iranian Supreme Leader/WANA (West Asia News Agency) via REUTERS)
Iran's Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei views the Iran nuclear achievements, in Tehran, Iran June 11, 2023.
(photo credit: Office of the Iranian Supreme Leader/WANA (West Asia News Agency) via REUTERS)

An earthquake felt throughout Iran on Saturday evening led to speculation about the country's use of nuclear weapons on social media.

A 4.6 magnitude earthquake allegedly struck Aradan, the Semnan province in northern Iran, on October 5,the US Goloigcal Survey reported last Wednesday, fueling speculations of a possible nuclear test

The earthquake struck at a shallow depth of 10 kilometers, a quake that was felt in Tehran, located around 110 kilometers awa. According to reports, aftershocks were felt in Israel. 

As such, Twitter/X users speculated that the occurrence was not an earthquake but rather a nuclear test, whereby Iran allegedly used test bombs 10 km below the surface in order to ensure minimum radiation exposure, which then resulted in an earthquake identified by seismographs.

Users wrote that a similar occurrence happened in North Korea in 2013 when an earthquake reportedly turned out to be a nuclear test. 

Advertisement

 A report by The Economic Times wrote that nuclear experts cautioned against these speculations and that while nuclear tests can trigger seismic events, the nature of the October 5 earthquake raised doubts. For example, Iran's fortified nuclear facilities and the earthquake's shallow depth complicate the notion of nuclear detonation, The Economic Times noted. 

Reports in recent weeks, following Iran's ballistic missile attack on Israel, have speculated that Israel may retaliate by striking Iranian nuclear facilities. 

Israel is not expected to attack Iran’s nuclear program but rather focus on various kinds of military bases and intelligence sites, The Jerusalem Post has learned, following a New York Times report on the issue.


Stay updated with the latest news!

Subscribe to The Jerusalem Post Newsletter


Despite being presented with the idea that the current context could be a once-in-50-years opportunity to attack Iran’s nuclear facilities, sources indicated that attacking Iran’s nuclear program would not necessarily be consistent with the “goals of the war” as set by the security cabinet.

Yonah Jeremy Bob contributed to this report. 

Advertisement

×
Email:
×
Email: